How does groupcache in Go compare to redis and memcached? -

i wondering if real life experience in groupcache , other memory caching tools such redis , memcached knows how compare each other in terms of performance, ease of use, , other areas worth mentioning.

the reason asking because interested in switching on go, don't have experience , no experience groupcache.

groupcache not meant full replacement redis or memcached. groupcache example doesn't support updating item or deleting it.

it's useful "hot" items want cache immutable.

also, compared redis, doesn't support of advanced features redis supports because has different intended usage scenario.

unless have such things, i'd recommend stick using redis or memcached.

indeed, if can trick implementation making each item immutable following logic (maybe address items key includes timestamp?) might able work-around guess might work compared using other solutions.

hope helps.